Calculator
NZ Fees Free 2026 Completion Cutoff Calculator
Estimate the conditional Fees Free amount exposed when a New Zealand qualification finishes after 31 December 2026.
Try it nowGuide & How-To
Since 1 July 2026 the Financial Markets Authority has regulated CCCFA consumer credit matters, including reports about loans made before that date. The contract date does not send a current complaint back to the Commerce Commission. Use this checker to identify the lender and dispute-scheme path, gather evidence for the issue you describe, and add interest and fees actually paid on your statements. The total is money to review, not a promised refund or a percentage of your loan.
Older loans go to the current regulator too
The Commerce Commission's transfer notice says the FMA took over CCCFA oversight on 1 July 2026, together with active investigations and most active litigation. The date of your agreement remains useful evidence: the lender's duties are assessed against the rules in force when it acted. But if you are reporting a CCCFA matter now, the FMA is the current regulator whether you borrowed in June 2026 or August 2026. A loan predating the transfer is not left without a complaint route.
A paid charge is evidence, not a refund formula
Enter interest and fees already paid from statements, then keep the invoices or transaction list that support each entry. Adding NZ$4,000 interest and NZ$500 fees produces a NZ$4,500 ledger. It does not mean a scheme will order NZ$4,500 back. The CCCFA has rules about lender responsibility, fees and remedies, but no blanket 10% fee refund, 20% of principal responsible-lending payment or fixed NZ$2,500 licensing award. Those guesses were removed from this tool. A decision maker must identify the specific breach and lawful remedy. FMA's fee guidance explains why fee type, disclosure and reasonableness matter.
The scheme handles your case; the FMA handles conduct oversight
First send a written complaint to the lender. If it cannot resolve the issue, use its approved dispute resolution scheme for a free independent review. FMA's consumer guidance lists four approved schemes, including Banking Ombudsman alongside IFSO, FSCL and FDRS. The lender's own scheme appears in its disclosure or on the Financial Service Providers Register. You may report a wider pattern to the FMA as well; the FMA says it cannot obtain a personal remedy for you. The regulator report is not a substitute for the individual dispute process.
Check the lender's legal status before accusing it of operating without a licence
The FMA's July 2026 licensing guidance says a business providing consumer credit generally needs a consumer credit provider licence. Some pre-transfer Commerce Commission certifications and other eligible licences became FMA licences automatically. A one-off private loan may sit outside the business-lending rule; a P2P firm may fall within it. A missing licence number on paperwork does not establish an offence or remove your repayment obligation. Verify the lender's legal name on the register, then ask the FMA about uncertainty.
Keep hardship timing separate from a complaint deadline
A borrower can ask to change payments after an unforeseen hardship, and Consumer Protection's hardship guidance gives a 20-working-day decision window for that application. That number is not a universal response deadline for an affordability, fee or collection complaint. State clearly whether you are asking for a payment change, challenging the original loan decision, disputing a charge, or doing both. Keep copies of your correspondence and use your lender's actual complaint policy and scheme terms for the dispute timeline.
What the numbers actually mean for you
A loan signed before July still has the FMA as today's regulator
The Commerce Commission's transfer guidance is explicit: on 1 July 2026 the FMA took over CCCFA regulation, active investigations and most active litigation. A contract signed in 2024 does not leave a current consumer-credit report with the Commission. The older date still matters because the lender's duties must be evaluated under the rules and disclosures applicable when it acted.
A borrower should keep the signed contract, each variation, the original disclosure and a complete transaction history. The checker asks for the origination period to tailor that record reminder. It cannot establish that a lender's earlier conduct was lawful or unlawful. Changing the current regulator did not erase a possible complaint about older conduct, and it did not create a new automatic cash remedy for it.
FMA oversight is separate from the individual dispute. The FMA can investigate market conduct and use statutory tools such as stop and direction orders. Its consumer dispute guidance says it cannot obtain a personal remedy for you. A lender's independent dispute scheme can consider an individual outcome. You can tell the FMA about a wider pattern while taking your own claim through the lender and scheme.
Count what your statements show before asking for a refund
Tane's statement ledger has NZ$4,000 of interest actually paid and NZ$500 of paid fees. The arithmetic is NZ$4,500. That total helps him identify transactions to query; it is not a legal entitlement. Some charges may be lawful, some may not, and the correct remedy can depend on contract terms, disclosures, the alleged breach and the scheme's or court's decision. There is no official CCCFA rule that turns his NZ$15,000 principal into a 20% responsible-lending payout.
A different borrower, Mere, may also have borrowed NZ$15,000 but have paid only NZ$600 interest and NZ$150 fees when she complains. Her ledger is NZ$750, even though her original principal matched Tane's. The difference shows why principal-based refund estimates cannot be trusted. Nor can the full NZ$750 be assumed refundable: the decisive evidence is which specific charges are disputed and why they breach the applicable rule.
Write down each charge's date, description, amount and where it appears in the agreement or disclosure. For an affordability issue, also seek the lender's records of income and expense inquiries. FMA's credit-fees guidance explains that lenders must disclose fees and apply the CCCFA's reasonableness rules. A paid amount is a starting fact; a legal conclusion is the later step.
Verify the licence; do not guess from a missing number
The FMA's licence guidance says a business acting as a creditor under a consumer credit contract generally needs a consumer credit provider licence from 1 July 2026. Some entities that already held Commerce Commission certification, or an applicable FMA or Reserve Bank licence, were deemed to hold the new licence at transfer. The new regime did not make every existing lender unlicensed overnight.
A one-off loan between private people may fall outside the business-lending licence requirement; an online P2P lender in the business of providing regulated credit may not. The label private or P2P cannot resolve that distinction. Search the Financial Service Providers Register using the legal entity name and keep a screenshot of the result. If the position is unclear, ask the FMA. Failure to find a number printed on your contract is a reason to verify, not proof of an offence or a right to stop repayments.
The checker deliberately gives the same FMA reporting route for a bank, finance company or private lender when a CCCFA issue might exist, while warning that applicability requires individual review. It does not decide whether an arrangement is a consumer credit contract. That classification can change the law that applies, so take the contract to a qualified adviser or free financial mentor if the lender disputes coverage.
Find the scheme that can decide your individual dispute
Write to the lender's complaints team first. State the decision or charge you dispute, what the documents show and what outcome you seek. If the matter is not resolved, the lender's approved dispute resolution scheme can consider it without a consumer fee. FMA guidance lists four schemes: Banking Ombudsman, Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO), Financial Services Complaints Limited (FSCL) and Financial Dispute Resolution Service (FDRS). Do not assume that every bank belongs to the same scheme or that there are only three.
The scheme's name belongs in the lender's disclosure and on the Financial Service Providers Register. A complaint to the FMA can help identify market misconduct, but the regulator does not adjudicate your personal refund. You do not need to invent a statutory NZ$2,500 penalty or a 10% fee refund to describe the issue. Ask the scheme what it can assess under your contract and the applicable law.
The 20-working-day decision deadline often quoted online applies to a lender's formal hardship application, which is a separate request to change payment terms after an unforeseen event. It is not a universal deadline for all credit complaints. If you are asking to pause or restructure payments because of hardship, tell the lender that specifically. If you are challenging a fee or lending decision, follow the lender and scheme's complaint process and check their actual response requirements.
Tally charges actually paid; a complaint award needs a decision
D is interest and fees already paid according to your own statements. It is a document-check total, never an estimated refund or statutory damages. A dispute scheme or court must decide whether each charge was lawful and whether an individual remedy is due. No CCCFA provision awards a standard percentage of the outstanding principal merely because a borrower selects a complaint category.
Since 1 July 2026 the FMA has been the current CCCFA regulator for both old and new consumer loans. The Commerce Commission says active investigations and most litigation transferred too. The contract date helps identify the historical conduct and documents to check; it does not route a current report back to the Commission. Your own refund request goes to the lender and its approved dispute resolution scheme. The FMA may investigate conduct but says it cannot obtain an individual remedy for you.
Calculation Steps:
- Choose whether the agreement began before or after 1 July 2026. In either case, the current CCCFA regulator is the FMA; keep the original agreement to establish which conduct and disclosure rules applied when it was signed.
- Classify the lender only as far as your documents support. A private loan is not automatically exempt or unlawful; whether the creditor is in the business of providing consumer credit matters to licensing.
- Choose the issue most closely supported by records: affordability checks, unreasonable fees, debt collection or licence status. The result lists evidence to obtain, not a finding that the lender breached the law.
- Enter interest and fees that have actually been paid, using statements or receipts. Their sum is the charge ledger to review. Unpaid future interest, the outstanding principal and hypothetical penalties are excluded.
- Send a written complaint to the lender and identify its approved scheme on the Financial Service Providers Register. If the matter is unresolved, ask that scheme for an independent decision. The FMA also accepts conduct reports but does not award your personal refund.
Worked example
Tane borrowed NZ$15,000 from a finance company in August 2026. His statements show NZ$4,000 in interest and NZ$500 in fees already paid. The widget adds these records to NZ$4,500 of charges to review. It does not turn the NZ$15,000 principal into a guessed 20% award or assume the NZ$4,500 will be refunded.
Tane says the repayments were unaffordable when the contract was approved. He asks for the lender's affordability assessment, the income and expense evidence used, the initial disclosure, and a full account statement. Missed repayments alone do not prove a breach; he needs to compare what the lender knew at the time with the contract it offered.
He complains to the lender in writing and checks the lender's legal name on the FSPR for its approved dispute scheme. If the complaint is unresolved, the scheme can independently assess it. He can also tell the FMA about a broader conduct problem. Neither the tool nor the FMA report promises a refund, and the 20-working-day rule for hardship applications should not be presented as a universal complaint deadline.
Input definitions
Review the glossary of terms used in the calculation model below. Click on highlighted links to read more in-depth definitions in our financial glossary:
| Parameter | Definition & Context |
|---|---|
| When the loan began | This sets the period whose contract and conduct records you need. The FMA is today's CCCFA regulator for either date option. |
| Lender type | A bank, finance company or private/P2P creditor may have different licensing circumstances. Do not infer an exemption or offence from the label alone. |
| Interest already paid | Read this from actual statements. The number is part of an evidence ledger, not the amount a scheme has decided to refund. |
| Fees already paid | Include disclosed loan and default fees you have paid. The legality and any refund depend on the fee and case facts. |
| Licence verification | Check the lender's legal name and current consumer credit provider licence on the FSPR. An absent number on paperwork is not proof that a creditor is unlicensed. |
Built & Maintained
